ASIC media releases are point-in-time statements. Please note the date of issue and use the internal search function on the site to check for other media releases on the same or related matters.

Friday 24 May 2013

13-120MR ASIC appeals decision in Macquarie Bank class action settlement

ASIC has appealed the recent decision of the Federal Court of Australia to approve the settlement between former Storm Financial clients and Macquarie Bank Limited.

The settlement follows a class action brought against the bank by Sydney law firm Levitt Robinson.

The settlement will see Macquarie Bank pay $82.5 million (inclusive of legal and administrative costs) in final settlement of the claims of 1050 Storm clients who took out margin loans with the bank.

Under the settlement, around 315 investors who funded the class action will be reimbursed their legal costs and also compensated for approximately 42% of their losses (as estimated by Levitt Robinson) while around 735 Macquarie borrowers will only get back about 18% of their losses (as estimated by Levitt Robinson).

During proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia on 2 May 2013 for approval of the settlement, ASIC intervened to express concerns about matters affecting the fairness of the deal.

On 3 May 2013 Justice Logan approved the settlement.

ASIC’s appeal relates to:

  • the distribution of the money, which is not in proportion to losses suffered

  • whether a funders’ premium for class action members who funded the action amounts to an unfair advantage for those members at the expense of the remaining 70% of class action members, and

  • whether inadequate notice was given to class action members of the prospect of payment of a funders’ premium.

ASIC deputy chairman Peter Kell said, ‘Settlement of a class action should be undertaken in the interests of the class action group as a whole. ASIC’s appeal raises the question whether this settlement was unfair to the 70% of class action members who did not, or were unable to, contribute to the funding of the action.’


ASIC’s various actions in connection with Storm continue, including its proceeding (brought in part on behalf of two former Storm investors) against Macquarie Bank, Bank of Queensland Limited, and Senrac Pty Limited, with ASIC alleging unconscionable conduct in connection with their dealings with Storm investors. The trial is scheduled to start on 3 June 2013.

ASIC has also alleged that Macquarie Bank, along with Bank of Queensland, was knowingly concerned in the conduct by Storm of an illegal managed investment scheme. Judgment in this case has been reserved.

ASIC’s dedicated Storm website details the numerous actions undertaken in recent years:

Editor's note:

ASIC's appeal to the Full Court of the Federal Court was heard in Brisbane on 5 August 2013. Judgment has been reserved.

Last updated: 06/08/2013 12:00