ASIC today published its annual overview of corporate insolvencies based on statutory reports lodged by external administrators for the 2013–14 financial year.
Report 412 Insolvency statistics: External administrators’ reports (July 2013 to June 2014) (REP 412) is ASIC's sixth report and provides information on the nature of corporate insolvencies, supplementing the monthly and quarterly statistics that ASIC publishes on its website.
The report summarises information from 10,073 reports received during the 2013–14 financial year and includes ASIC's response to reports of alleged misconduct from external administrators.
Commissioner John Price acknowledged the work of external administrators in carrying out their investigations and reporting to ASIC.
'External administrators' reports are a critical source of intelligence for ASIC. In addition to providing more detailed qualitative data, the information obtained from reports helps ASIC focus its regulatory efforts. It also helps us assess whether enforcement action is warranted, or if a director banning action should be pursued.
'We encourage external administrators to provide these reports and any allegations of misconduct in a timely manner to assist in our supervision of insolvency and corporate governance issues,' Mr Price said.
Profile of insolvent companies
REP 412 includes information about the profile of companies placed into external administration, including:
- industry types
- employee numbers
- causes of company failure
- estimated number and value of a company’s unsecured creditor debts, and
- estimated dividends to unsecured creditors.
Table 1 summarises key data from the report.
REP 412 shows small to medium size corporate insolvencies again dominated external administrators’ reports. Of note, 86% had assets of $100,000 or less, 81% had less than 20 employees and 43% had liabilities of $250,000 (or less).
97% of creditors in this group received between 0–11 cents in the dollar, reflecting the asset/liability profile of small to medium size corporate insolvencies.
Allegations of misconduct
REP 412 details how often external administrators report alleged misconduct by company officers and the types of alleged misconduct most frequently reported.
In the 2013–14 financial year, 7,218 reports alleging misconduct were lodged with ASIC by external administrators.
ASIC asked external administrators to prepare 802 supplementary reports where external administrators alleged company officer misconduct. This accounted for 11.1% of all reports, which alleged misconduct, lodged in the financial year.
Supplementary reports are typically detailed, free-format reports, which set out the results of the external administrator’s inquiries and the evidence they have to support alleged offences. Generally, ASIC can determine whether to commence a formal investigation on the basis of a supplementary report. While only a portion of the offences reported may result in a formal investigation or surveillance, ASIC uses the information for broader intelligence and targeting purposes. In both the 2012–13 and 2013–14 financial years, after assessment, ASIC referred 25% and 19% of these cases respectively for investigation or surveillance.
ASIC considers a range of factors when deciding to investigate and take enforcement action and this is detailed in Information Sheet 151 ASIC’s approach to enforcement (INFO 151).
Future improvements: Reporting of alleged insolvent trading and other offences
To assist external administrators in their reporting obligations, ASIC anticipates releasing an amended report template for external administrators (Form EX01) in early-2015.
The amendments aim to capture more accurate information on alleged insolvent trading offences which might provide greater insight into the extent of insolvent trading and enable ASIC to focus our resources on matters that warrant further investigation.
The revised form is a further ASIC initiative to collect better information on corporate insolvencies in Australia. It complements recent enhancements to other forms to capture data in electronic format such as:
industry statistics for external administration appointments from Form 505 (notice of appointment) key information from deeds of company arrangement from an enhanced Form 5047, and key financial data from Form 524 (presentation of accounts and statement).
ASIC expects to continue our work with industry to improve reporting including on other offences, such as alleged breaches of director duties.
Background
REP 412 is ASIC’s fourth annual report and sixth report since external administrators’ reports could be lodged electronically. ASIC’s previous reports are:
- REP 372 (refer 13-277MR) – Annual Statistics for 2012–2013
- REP 297 (refer: 12-218MR) – Annual statistics for 2011–2012
- REP 263 (refer: 11-263MR) – Annual statistics for 2010–2011
- REP 225 (refer: 10-277AD) – Triennial statistics for 2007–2010
- REP 132 (refer: 08-133) – Triennial statistics for 2004–2007
Table 1: Summary of key data from REP 412
| 2013-14 | 2012-13 | 2011-12 | |
| Profile of companies | |||
| No. of employees affected | 81% of reports concerned companies with less than 20 employees | 81% of reports concerned companies with less than 20 employees | 78% of reports concerned companies with less than 20 employees |
| Industries with most lodgements | Other (business and personal) services (2,482 reports or 26%) Construction (2,153 reports or 23%) Accommodation and Food Services (916 reports or 10%) |
Construction (2,245 reports or 24%) Other (business and personal) services (2,220 reports or 24%) Retail trade (904 reports or 10%) |
Other (business and personal) services (2,369 reports or 24%) Construction (2,229 reports or 22%) Retail trade (1,024 reports or 10%) |
| Assets and liabilities | 86% of failed companies had estimated assets of $100,000 or less 43% of failed companies had estimated liabilities of $250,000 or less |
85% of failed companies had estimated assets of $100,000 or less 43% of failed companies had estimated liabilities of $250,000 or less |
85% of failed companies had estimated assets of $100,000 or less 42% of failed companies had estimated liabilities of $250,000 or less |
| Deficiency | 65% of filed companies had an estimated deficiency of $500,000 or less | 65% of failed companies had an estimated deficiency of $500,000 or less | 64% of failed companies had an estimated deficiency of $500,000 or less |
| Top 3 nominated causes of failure | Inadequate cash flow or high cash use (4,031 or 41% of reports) Poor strategic management of business (3,975 or 37% of reports) Trading losses (3,078 or 33% of reports |
Poor strategic management of business (3,908 or 42% of reports) Inadequate cash flow or high cash use (3,829 or 41% of reports) Trading losses (2,989 or 32% of reports |
Poor strategic management of business (4,449 or 44% of reports) Inadequate cash flow or high cash use (4,048 or 40% of reports) Trading losses (3,326 or 33% of reports) |
| Top 3 alleged possible misconduct | s588G(1)–(2) Insolvent trading (5,425 or 57% of reports) s286 and 344(1) Obligation to keep financial records (3,466 or 37% of reports) s180 Care and diligence—Directors’ and officers’ duties (2,542 or 27% of reports) |
s588G(1)–(2) Insolvent trading (4,872 or 53% of reports) s286 and 344(1) Obligation to keep financial records (3,263 or 35% of reports) s180 Care and diligence—Directors’ and officers’ duties (2,302 or 25% of reports) |
s588G(1)–(2) Insolvent trading (5,075 or 50% of reports) s286 and 344(1) Obligation to keep financial records 3,361 or 33% of reports) s180 Care and diligence—Directors’ and officers’ duties (2,376 or 24% of reports) |
| Dividends to unsecured creditors | In 97% of cases, the dividend estimate was less than 11 cents in the dollar | In 97% of cases, the dividend estimate was less than 11 cents in the dollar | In 98% of cases, the dividend estimate was less than 11 cents in the dollar |