ASIC media releases are point-in-time statements. Please note the date of issue and use the internal search function on the site to check for other media releases on the same or related matters.

Friday 30 August 2019

19-235MR Online publishing company and former director found liable for misleading and deceptive statements about mimicking the Future Fund

The Federal Court of Australia has found an AFSL holder and its former director made misleading and deceptive statements about an investment strategy targeting retired investors and investors approaching retirement, said to mimic the performance of the Australian Government’s Future Fund.

Port Phillip Publishing Pty Ltd (PPP) and its former director, Kristan Sayce, reached agreement with ASIC on the facts to be considered by the Court and the resulting contraventions of the law and the parties made joint submissions on those matters and on the declarations that should be made and penalties imposed as a result. The Court then ordered the following penalties for PPP and Mr Sayce as were proposed by the parties in that joint submission: 

  • $600,000 penalty for PPP; and
  • $50,000 penalty for Mr Sayce.

The two documents in which the misleading statements were made were published in September 2017 and entitled ‘Everyday Australians Now Legally ‘Piggybacking’ ‘the Future Fund’…and collecting extra monthly income injections of $540 right up to $6,667’ (Promo Letter) and ‘Your Quick Start Guide to Piggybacking the Future Fund’ (Guide). 

PPP published the Promo Letter, promoting the Guide, on two of its websites and emailed copies of the Promo Letter to approximately 200,000 subscribers. The Promo Letter and Guide promoted investing in a portfolio of specific listed investment companies and exchange traded funds which was said could mimic the performance of the Australian Government’s Future Fund. The Future Fund is Australia’s sovereign wealth fund. It is not open to direct public investment.

PPP’s Guide could only be accessed if a person subscribed to a service called Total Income and paid a subscription fee ($49). 823 people paid for a copy of the Guide. The parties also submitted that representations contained in testimonials about the Promo Letter were false and misleading.

‘If investors had adopted the investment strategy in PPP’s Guide, they were likely to have generated lower returns than the returns promoted in the Promo Letter and exposed investors to a greater level of risk than that adopted by the Future Fund in September 2017. ASIC seeks to promote confident and informed participation of investors and in this case, investors were misled,’ said ASIC Deputy Chair Daniel Crennan QC.

Download the Court’s declarations and orders

Background

ASIC commenced proceedings against PPP and Mr Sayce on 20 December 2018 (18-393MR).

PPP and Mr Sayce admitted that various statements contained in the Promo Letter and Guide, which related to the identity and expertise of the author, the extent of research conducted in relation to the investment strategy and the income that could be generated from adopting the investment strategy were misleading, deceptive and false. They further admitted that the Promo Letter and the Guide failed to disclose facts about the frequency of dividend returns and risks to which an investor might be exposed from adopting the investment strategy. PPP and Mr Sayce also relied on and misused client testimonials in the Promo Letter in that they failed to disclose that each client had never adopted the investment strategy.

Editor’s note

On 10 September 2019, Justice O’Callaghan published reasons for making the orders and declarations on 29 August 2019. A copy of his honour’s decision can be found here.  

Last updated: 10/09/2019 03:50