Following an ASIC investigation, Mr Clive Frederick Palmer, 66 of Broadbeach Waters in Queensland, has been charged with two counts of contravening section 184(2)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Act) - dishonest use of position as a director and two counts of contravening section 408C(1)(d) of the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) – fraud by dishonestly gaining a benefit or advantage.
ASIC alleges that between 5 August 2013 and 5 September 2013, Mr Palmer dishonestly obtained a benefit or advantage for Cosmo Developments Pty Ltd and/or the Palmer United Party (PUP) and others by authorising the transfer of $10,000,000 contrary to the purpose for which the funds were being held. It is alleged that he dishonestly used his position as a director of Mineralogy Pty Ltd (Mineralogy), a mining company owned by him, in obtaining that advantage.
ASIC also alleges that, between 31 August 2013 and 3 September 2013, Mr Palmer dishonestly obtained a benefit or advantage for Media Circus Network Pty Ltd and/or PUP by authorising the transfer of $2,167,065.60 contrary to the purpose for which the funds were being held. It is alleged that Mr Palmer dishonestly used his position as a director of Mineralogy in obtaining that advantage.
The maximum penalty for an offence under section 184(2) of the Act is $340,000 or imprisonment for five years, or both.
The maximum penalty for an offence under section 408C of the Code is five years’ imprisonment. However, if circumstances of aggravation are established the maximum penalty at the time the offences are alleged to have occurred is increased to 12 years’ imprisonment.
The matter was first mentioned in the Brisbane Magistrates Court on 20 March 2020, at which time the matter was adjourned for further mention on 17 July 2020. On 17 July 2020 the matter was adjourned until 28 August 2020.
The matter is being prosecuted by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.
Editor's note 1:
On 28 August 2020, the matter was mentioned in the Brisbane Magistrates Court and adjourned for further mention on 27 November 2020.
Editor's note 2:
On 27 November 2020, the matter was heard in the Brisbane Magistrates' Court and was adjourned for further mention on 11 March 2021.
Editor’s note 3:
On 9 March 2021, Clive Palmer filed a Claim with the Supreme Court of Queensland seeking an order that the prosecution in the Magistrates Court be permanently stayed.
Editor’s note 4:
On 11 March 2021, the matter was heard in the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court and was adjourned for further mention on 11 June 2021.
Editor’s note 5:
On 6 May 2021, Clive Palmer wholly discontinued his Claim filed on 9 March 2021 in the Supreme Court of Queensland.
Editor's note 6:
On 3 June 2021, Clive Palmer filed a Claim with the Supreme Court of Queensland seeking an order that the prosecution in the Magistrates Court be permanently stayed.
Editor's note 7:
On 11 June 2021, the matter was heard in the Brisbane Magistrate’s Court and was adjourned for further mention on 17 September 2021.
Editor's note 8:
On 1 July 2021, ASIC, the CDPP and another person filed an application in the proceedings commenced by Mr Palmer on 3 June 2021 (Palmer stay proceedings, refer Editor's note 6). The application seeks orders to set aside, stay or alternatively, strike out the Palmer stay proceedings.
The application made by ASIC, the CDPP and another person is listed to be heard on 23 August 2021 in the Queensland Supreme Court.
Editor’s note 9:
The application filed by ASIC, the CDPP and another person on 1 July 2021 (Commonwealth application) that was to have been heard on 23 August 2021 (refer Editor’s note 8) has been listed for hearing on 22 September 2021.
Editor’s note 10:
The hearing of the application filed by ASIC, the CDPP and another person on 1 July 2021 (Commonwealth application) listed for 22 September 2021 has been vacated. The Commonwealth application has been listed for a directions hearing on 22 September 2021.
Editor’s note 11:
On 17 September 2021, the matter was mentioned in the Brisbane Magistrate’s Court and was adjourned for further mention on 10 December 2021.
Editor's note 12:
On 21 September 2021, Mr Palmer filed an Amended Statement of Claim in the Palmer Stay Proceedings.
Editor’s note 13:
At the directions hearing held on 22 September 2021 before the Queensland Supreme Court, the Commonwealth Application was listed for hearing on 7 February 2022.
Editor’s note 14:
On 10 December 2021, the matter was mentioned in the Brisbane Magistrate’s Court and was adjourned for further mention on 4 March 2022.
Editor’s note 15:
On 7-9 February 2022, ASIC and the CDPP’s application to set aside, stay or alternatively, strike out the Palmer stay proceedings (refer Editor’s notes 6 and 8) was part heard together with an application by Mr Palmer for summary judgment in the stay proceedings. The applications have been listed for further hearing on 9-10 March 2022.
Editor’s note 16:
On 4 March 2022, the criminal proceedings were mentioned in the Brisbane Magistrates' Court and were adjourned for further mention on 1 April 2022.
Editor's note 17:
On 9 March 2022, Mr Palmer’s application for summary judgment in the stay proceedings was heard further. ASIC and the CDPP’s application to set aside, stay or alternatively strike out the Palmer stay proceedings (refer editor’s note 6 and 8) was mentioned and listed for review on 26 April 2022. Both applications have been listed for further hearing on 31 May and 1 June 2022.
Editor’s note 18:
On 1 April 2022, the criminal proceedings were mentioned in the Brisbane Magistrates' Court and were adjourned for further mention on 1 July 2022.
Editor's note 19:
On 26 April 2022, a case management hearing for ASIC and the CDPP’s application to set aside, stay or alternatively, strike out the Palmer stay proceedings (refer Editor’s notes 6 and 8) took place. The application remains listed for further hearing on 31 May and 1 June 2022.
Editor's note 20:
On 31 May – 1 June 2022, ASIC and the CDPP’s application to set aside, stay or alternatively, strike out the Palmer stay proceedings (refer editor’s note 6 and 8) was heard. Justice Callaghan reserved his judgment.
Editor’s note 21:
On 1 July 2022, the criminal proceedings were mentioned in the Brisbane Magistrates' Court and adjourned for further mention on 21 October 2022.
Editor's note 22:
On 20 October 2022, ASIC and the CDPP’s application to set aside or alternatively, strike out the Palmer stay proceedings (refer to editor’s note 6 and 8) and Mr Palmer’s application for summary judgment of the stay proceedings (refer editor’s note 15 and 17) were listed for delivery of judgment. Without making final orders, Justice Callaghan:
- confirmed his earlier indication (given on 9 March 2022) that Mr Palmer’s summary judgment application will be dismissed; and
- indicated that ASIC and the CDDP’s application to permanently stay the Palmer stay proceedings will be granted.
The parties to the proceedings now have until 27 October 2022 to file written submissions in respect of costs and any other orders that may be required. His Honour indicated that he will finalize his judgment and pronounce all orders of the Court on a date (not yet fixed) following receipt of these submissions and that the time for any appeal will not commence to run until after he has done so.
Editor’s Note 23:
On 21 October 2022, the criminal proceedings were mentioned in the Brisbane Magistrates' Court and adjourned for further mention on 2 December 2022.
Editor’s note 24:
On 16 November 2022, Justice Callaghan delivered judgment in the Palmer stay proceedings (refer editor’s note 6) and ordered that:
- Palmer’s summary judgment application be dismissed (refer Editor’s note 15 and 17);
- the Palmer stay proceedings be permanently stayed (refer Editor’s note 8, 17 and 20);
- ASIC and the CDPP’s costs of the stay proceedings be paid by Palmer on an indemnity basis; and
- the Attorney-General for the State of Queensland’s costs of the stay proceedings be paid by Palmer.
Editor’s note 25:
On 2 December 2022, the criminal proceedings were mentioned in the Brisbane Magistrates' Court and adjourned for further mention on 3 February 2023.
Editor’s note 26:
On 7 December 2022, Mr Palmer filed a notice of appeal with the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland from the judgment of Justice Callaghan delivered on 16 November 2022 (refer Editor’s note 24).
Editor’s note 27:
On 31 January 2023, the appeal was mentioned in the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland. President Mullins listed the appeal for hearing over four days on dates to be fixed in July 2023 (refer Editor’s notes 26 and 29).
Editor’s note 28:
On 3 February 2023, the criminal proceedings were mentioned in the Brisbane Magistrates' Court and adjourned for further mention on 27 February 2023.
Editor’s note 29:
On 7 February 2023, the appeal was mentioned in the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland. President Mullins listed the appeal for hearing on 18 – 21 September 2023 (refer Editor’s note 26).
Editor’s note 30:
On 27 February 2023, the criminal proceedings were mentioned in the Brisbane Magistrates' Court and the prosecution’s application for directions was listed for hearing on 3 April 2023.
Editor's note 31:
On 3 April 2023, the prosecution’s application for directions was heard and adjourned until 2 May 2023.
Editor's note 32:
On 2 May 2023, the prosecution’s application for directions was heard and adjourned until 30 June 2023.
Editor’s note 33:
On 30 June 2023, the prosecution’s application for directions was heard in the Brisbane Magistrates Court and was successful in obtaining directions that the defendants provide committal notices to progress the prosecutions to committal hearing.
Three applications brought by Mr Palmer, which included an application for an adjournment of the entire committal proceeding until after all appeal rights had been exhausted in the appeals (refer Editor’s note 29), were refused.
The prosecution has been adjourned for further mention on 7 August 2023.
Editor’s note 34:
On 11 July 2023, Clive Palmer filed an application for the review of the decisions made by Magistrate Pinder at the directions hearing held in the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court on 30 June 2023 (refer editor’s note 33).
The application is listed for a directions hearing in the Supreme Court of Queensland on 25 July 2023.
Editor’s note 35:
On 17 July 2023, the appeal was mentioned for review before Justice Dalton in the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland. The appeal has been listed for further review on 4 August 2023 and hearing on 18 – 21 September 2023 (refer Editor’s note 29).
Editor’s note 36:
On 25 July 2023, the application for review filed by Clive Palmer was mentioned before Justice Burns in the Supreme Court of Queensland. The application was adjourned for hearing on 1 August 2023 in the Supreme Court of Queensland (refer Editor’s note 34).
Editor’s note 37:
In addition to the application filed on 11 July 2023 (refer Editor’s note 34), on 28 July 2023, Clive Palmer and Palmer Leisure Coolum Pty Ltd filed a second application for the review of the decisions made by Magistrate Pinder at the directions hearing held in the Brisbane Magistrate’s Court on 30 June 2023.
On 1 August 2023, both applications for review filed by Clive Palmer and Palmer Leisure Coolum Pty Ltd were mentioned before Justice Burns in the Supreme Court of Queensland. The applications for review were both adjourned for further hearing on 25 August 2023 in the Supreme Court of Queensland (refer Editor’s notes 34 and 36).
Editor’s note 38:
On 4 August 2023, the appeal was mentioned for review before Justice Dalton in the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland. The appeal has been listed for further review on 11 August 2023 and hearing on 18 – 21 September 2023 (refer Editor’s notes 29 and 35).
Editor's note 39:
On 2 August 2023, Mr Palmer and Palmer Leisure Coolum Pty Ltd filed an application with the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court seeking orders to set aside or dismiss the charges as an abuse of process. A further application for directions was filed on 4 August 2023 by Mr Palmer and Palmer Leisure Coolum Pty Ltd seeking orders for cross examination. On 7 August 2023, the Brisbane Magistrate’s Court listed the applications for hearing on 6 and 7 November 2023. On 8 August 2023 two further applications were filed by Mr Palmer and Palmer Leisure Coolum Pty Ltd for directions as to particulars and as to disclosure.
Editor's note 40:
On 11 August 2023, the appeal was mentioned for review before Justice Dalton in the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland. The appeal is listed for hearing on 18 – 21 September 2023 (refer Editor’s note 38).
Editor's note 41:
On 25 August 2023, the applications for judicial review filed by Mr Palmer on 11 July 2023 and 28 July 2023 respectively were heard by Justice Wilson in the Supreme Court of Queensland (refer Editor’s notes 34, 36 and 37).
Justice Wilson granted Mr Palmer leave to discontinue his applications and ordered him to pay the costs of the applications which were incurred by ASIC and the CDPP between 7 August 2023 and 21 August 2023.
Editor’s Note 42:
On 18 and 19 September 2023 the appeals were heard before the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland (refer Editors notes 35, 38 and 40). Judgment was reserved by the Court with no indication given as to when it will be delivered.
Editor’s note 43:
On 24 October 2023, Mr Palmer filed an application in the Brisbane Magistrate’s Court seeking an adjournment of the hearing of the applications set down for hearing on 6 and 7 November 2023 (see Editor’s Note 56) until after the determination of the appeal in the Court of Appeal (refer Editor’s note 59). The application has been listed for hearing in the Magistrate’s Court at Brisbane on 2 November 2023.
Editor’s note 44:
On 2 November 2023, Mr Palmer’s application for an adjournment of the applications set down for hearing on 6 and 7 November 2023 (refer Editor’s note 39) in the Magistrates Court at Brisbane until after the determination of the appeal in the Court of Appeal (refer Editor’s note 42) was adjourned until 6 November 2023.
Editor’s note 45:
On 6 November 2023, on the application of Mr Palmer, the applications set down for hearing on 6 and 7 November 2023 (see Editor’s Note 39) in the Magistrates Court at Brisbane were adjourned for mention on 15 December 2023 pending the determination of the appeal in the Court of Appeal (see Editor’s note 42).
Editor's note 46:
On 14 December 2023 the applications listed for mention on 15 December 2023 (refer Editor’s notes 39 and 45) in the Magistrates Court at Brisbane were adjourned for mention on 16 February 2024.
Editor’s note 47:
On 6 February 2024 the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland delivered judgment in the appeal heard on 18 and 19 September 2023 (refer Editor’s note 42). In a unanimous decision the Court of Appeal ordered that:
- Mr Palmer’s appeal (refer Editor’s note 26) be dismissed; and
- ASIC and the CDPP’s costs of the appeals be paid by Mr Palmer.
Editor's note 48:
On 16 February 2024 the prosecution of Mr Palmer, including the applications (see Editor’s notes 39, 45 and 46), were mentioned in the Magistrates Court at Brisbane and adjourned for further mention on 15 March 2024.
Editor's note 49:
On 5 March 2024 Mr Palmer filed an application in the High Court of Australia for special leave to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal of Queensland dated 6 February 2024 (refer Editor’s note 47).
Editor's note 50:
On 14 March 2024 the mention listed on 15 March 2024 (refer Editor’s note 48) was adjourned to 3 May 2024.
Editor’s note 51:
On 1 May 2024, the mention of the prosecution of Mr Palmer listed on 3 May 2024, including the applications (refer Editor’s notes 45, 46 and 48), was adjourned to 7 June 2024. On 21 May 2024 Mr Palmer filed a further application in the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court for an adjournment to allow evidence to be obtained in another jurisdiction.
Editor's note 52:
On 6 June 2024, the High Court of Australia refused the Application for Special Leave made by Mr Palmer with costs (refer Editor’s note 49).
HCA Disposition - Palmer v Mags Court of QLD & Ors (PDF 154 KB)
Editor's note 53:
On 7 June 2024 the prosecution and the applications (refer Editor's notes 39 and 51) were mentioned in the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court. The applications were listed for a 2-day hearing commencing on 1 August 2024.
Editor’s Note 54:
On 1 and 2 August 2024, applications of Mr Palmer (refer Editor’s note 39) were heard in the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court. The court:
- dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the charges against Mr Palmer as an abuse of process;
- directed the defendant’s application for disclosure be adjourned to a case management hearing on 28 October 2024.
In dismissing the defendant’s application, the magistrate was not satisfied that the court had jurisdiction to make the orders sought by the defendant nor was he satisfied that there were grounds to dismiss the complaint if the court had the power to do so.
The defendant’s further applications were also adjourned without being heard, to the case management hearing on 28 October 2024.
Editor’s Note 55:
On 3 September 2024, Mr Palmer filed an application for the review of the decision made by Magistrate McKenzie at the directions hearing held in the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court on 1 and 2 August 2024 (refer Editor’s note 54).
The application is listed for directions in the Supreme Court of Queensland on 10 October 2024.
Editor’s Note 56:
On 10 October 2024, Mr Palmer’s application seeking judicial review (refer Editor’s note 55) was mentioned in the Supreme Court of Queensland at which time the ASIC and the CDPP filed interlocutory applications seeking orders that the proceedings be set aside for want of jurisdiction. On 14 October 2024, the court listed the interlocutory applications for hearing over two days commencing on 20 February 2025.
Editor’s Note 57:
At the case management hearing held on 28 October 2024 (refer Editor’s note 54) in the Brisbane Magistrates Court, the Court directed that Mr Palmer’s application for disclosure be listed for hearing on 28 and 29 November 2024. Mr Palmer’s application for particulars was also listed for further argument on 28 and 29 November 2024.
Editor’s Note 58:
The hearing of the applications for disclosure and particulars listed on 28 and 29 November 2024 has been adjourned to 11 and 12 February 2025.
Editor's Note 59:
On 6 January 2025, Mr Palmer commenced proceedings against ASIC and the CDPP by filing an Originating Application and Statement of Claim in the Victorian Registry of the Federal Court of Australia. ASIC and the CDPP applied to have the proceeding stayed and, subsequently, to have parts of Mr Palmer’s statement of claim struck out.
Editor’s Note 60:
On 11 February 2025, the application of Mr Palmer for disclosure was mentioned before the Magistrate’s Court at Brisbane. The hearing was adjourned until the week commencing 31 March 2025. The applications for directions as to particulars and for cross-examination of witnesses (refer Editor’s note 39) were listed for hearing on 22 September 2025.
The interlocutory applications of ASIC and the CDPP in respect of Mr Palmer’s application for judicial review by the Supreme Court of Queensland (refer Editor’s note 56) listed for hearing on 20 and 21 February 2025, has been listed for mention on 13 February 2025.
Editor’s Note 61:
ASIC and the CDPP’s interlocutory applications (refer Editor’s note 60) were mentioned in the Supreme Court of Queensland on 13 February 2025 and the matter was adjourned for hearing in relation to the question of jurisdiction on 20 and 21 February 2025.
Editor’s Note 62:
On 20 February 2025, an application to determine the appropriate jurisdiction for the hearing of Mr Palmer’s application for judicial review of the decision of Magistrate McKenzie (refer Editor’s notes 56 and 60) was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland. The decision has been reserved.
Editor’s Note 63:
On 9 May 2025, ASIC’s application to strike out parts of Mr Palmer’s statement of claim (refer Editor’s note 59) in the Victorian Registry of the Federal Court of Australia was listed for hearing on 22 May 2025.
Editor’s Note 64:
On 22 May 2025, the Federal Court ordered that certain paragraphs of Mr Palmer’s statement of claim be struck out and ordered Mr Palmer to file a further amended statement of claim (refer Editor’s notes 59 and 63). Mr Palmer filed a further amended statement of claim. ASIC subsequently applied to strike out or summarily dismiss parts of the further amended statement of claim on 14 July 2025.
Editor's Note 65:
On 5 June 2025, the Supreme Court of Queensland delivered its judgment in relation to ASIC and the CDPP’s interlocutory applications (refer Editors Notes 56, 60 and 61). The court made orders:
- substantially dismissing Mr Palmer’s application for judicial review of the decision of Magistrate McKenzie dated 1 August 2024 (see Editor’s Notes 54 and 55) for want of jurisdiction,
- transferring Mr Palmer’s amended application seeking orders quashing Magistrate McKenzie’s decision under s1337B(1) of the Corporations Act to the Federal Court of Australia.
Editor’s Note 66:
On 10 June 2025, the matter was listed for mention on 28 July 2025 in the Brisbane Magistrates Court.
Editor's Note 67:
On 3 July 2025, Mr Palmer filed an appeal against the decision of Martin SJA dated 5 June 2025 (see Editor’s Note 65) in the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland.
Editor's Note 68:
On 28 July 2025, the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court adjourned the matter for further mention on 12 September 2025.
Also on 28 July 2025, the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland listed Mr Palmer’s appeal (refer Editor’s note 67) for hearing on 22 October 2025.
Editor’s Note 69:
On 4 August 2025 Mr Palmer filed an application in Brisbane Magistrates Court seeking orders referring questions to the Queensland Supreme Court under the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld). The Court listed the application for hearing on 12 September 2025.
Editor’s Note 70:
On 22 August 2025 ASIC’s application filed on 14 July 2025 was heard by the Federal Court (refer Editor’s note 64). Justice McElwaine reserved his judgment.
Editor’s Note 71:
On 27 August 2025 Justice McElwaine dismissed ASIC’s application to strike out or summarily dismiss parts of the further amended statement of claim (refer Editor’s notes 64 and 70). The proceeding was adjourned to a case management hearing on 5 September 2025.
On 5 September 2025 the application to amend the statement of claim was adjourned for mention before Justice McElwaine on 30 October 2025.
Editor’s Note 72:
On 10 September 2025, ASIC sought leave to appeal from the judgment of Justice McElwaine dated 27 August 2025 (refer Editor’s note 71).
Editor’s Note 73:
On 12 September 2025, Mr Palmer’s applications under the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) were heard in the Brisbane Magistrates Court (refer Editor’s note 69). Magistrate McKenzie made orders referring questions to the Supreme Court of Queensland and adjourned the prosecutions of Mr Palmer and all extant applications currently before the Brisbane Magistrates Court to the Registry.
Editor’s Note 74:
On 8 October 2025, the questions under the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) (see Editor’s notes 69 and 73) were referred to Supreme Court of Queensland. The Court listed the proceedings for directions on 14 November 2025.
On 8 October 2025, the judicial review proceedings transferred to the Federal Court of Australia were listed for case management hearing (see Editor’s note 65). The application is listed for hearing on 11 December 2025.
Editor’s Note 75:
On 22 October 2025, the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland heard the appeal against the decision of Martin SJA (refer Editor’s notes 67 and 68). Judgment is reserved.
Editor’s Note 76:
On 27 October 2025, the application for leave to appeal against the decision of McElwaine J was listed for hearing before in the Federal Court of Australia on 28 April 2026 (refer Editor’s Notes 71 and 72).
Editor’s Note 77:
On 30 October 2025, the application to amend the statement of claim was mentioned in the Federal Court of Australia (refer Editor’s note 71). The Court reserved judgment on the application to remove the CDPP as a party and listed ASIC’s interlocutory application for hearing on 18 November 2025.
Editor’s Note 78:
The referral of questions to the Supreme Court of Queensland under the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) (see Editor’s Note 74) was mentioned in the Supreme Court on 14 November 2025.
The matter has been listed for hearing in the Supreme Court of Queensland on 20 February 2026.
Editor’s Note 79:
On 18 November 2025, Justice McElwaine dismissed the application by ASIC to dismiss the application by Mr Palmer for want of jurisdiction, and ordered the CDPP to be removed as a party (see Editor’s note 77). ASIC’s application to stay the proceedings is listed for hearing on 24 February 2026.