ASIC media releases are point-in-time statements. Please note the date of issue and use the internal search function on the site to check for other media releases on the same or related matters.

Wednesday 22 September 2021

21-253MR ASIC bans former dealer and portfolio manager Dylan Rands for market manipulation

ASIC has banned Dylan Christopher Rands, of Sydney, NSW, from providing financial services for five years after finding he engaged in market manipulation.

Mr Rands was a former dealer and portfolio manager at Regal Funds Management Pty Ltd (Regal). Regal operates managed investment schemes, known as funds. As part of his portfolio-manager role, Mr Rands managed trading in Clearview Wealth Limited shares, which were held in several Regal funds.

ASIC found Mr Rands engaged in manipulative trading in relation to Clearview Wealth shares and breached the Corporations Act when:

  • between December 2018 and June 2019, he entered into 112 uncommercial transactions which created, or were likely to create, an artificial price for the shares of Clearview Wealth;
  • on 27 March 2018 and 31 May 2019, he created a false or misleading appearance of active trading in Clearview Wealth.

Mr Rands’ pattern of trading involved purchasing Clearview Wealth shares which had the effect of increasing or restoring the Clearview Wealth share price shortly following a price fall.  Such trading displayed an absence of commerciality, in circumstances where Mr Rands’ objective was to exit the Clearview Wealth position he managed at Regal, which he ultimately sold in June 2019.

ASIC also found Mr Rands:

  • is not adequately trained, or is not competent, to provide financial services and perform functions as an officer of an entity that carries on a financial services business; and
  • is likely to contravene a financial services law.

Market manipulation is an enduring priority for ASIC. Market manipulation undermines the integrity of, and diminishes consumer confidence in, Australia’s financial markets.  

Mr Rands has the right to appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for a review of ASIC’s decision.

Last updated: 22/09/2021 12:06