Providing non-privileged information
If you make a claim of LPP as the holder of the privilege, or assert LPP on behalf of a third party, you must provide all non-privileged information to ASIC by the date specified. Failure to do so is likely to be a breach of the ASIC Act and may be a criminal offence.
When ASIC may require additional details
ASIC may require you to provide additional details in support of your LPP claim. For instance further details may be sought where:
- the only indicia of privilege in the privilege claims schedule you provide to ASIC is that a lawyer was a maker or a recipient of a communication. This is because the inclusion of a lawyer in a communication does not of itself satisfy the dominant purpose test required to establish LPP, or
- a person instructs an internal or external lawyer to conduct a review of facts and circumstances, some or all of which fall within the scope of an ASIC investigation. ASIC will not accept a claim that the mere occurrence of the lawyer’s review gives rise to a valid LPP claim over information relating to those facts and circumstances. ASIC draws a distinction between documents brought into existence for the purposes of the lawyer’s review, where a valid claim of LPP may be available, and the documents and information that existed prior to the lawyer’s review, where a valid claim of LPP is generally less likely to be available.
LPP claimed to be held by a company and one of its officers
If an officer of a company claims to hold LPP jointly with the company over information that appears to be company information, ASIC may require you to provide additional details in support of your claim that LPP is jointly held.
Waiver of privilege
ASIC will not accept a claim of LPP where the LPP holder or a joint LPP holder has waived the privilege or where the privilege holder or joint privilege holder has acted in a manner inconsistent with the maintenance of the privilege.
When you claim LPP over information on which you rely
Where you withhold information from ASIC because of a claim of LPP and at the same time rely on the information withheld to justify or defend your conduct, ASIC will require an explanation as to why the basis on which you assert LPP has not been waived by that reliance. If you withhold information and rely, or intend later to rely, on the information to justify or defend your conduct, you should also consider:
- voluntary confidential disclosure of LPP information to ASIC pursuant to ASIC’s ‘Voluntary confidential LPP disclosure agreement’. The disclosure of the information may narrow the issues in ASIC’s investigation or lead to a quicker conclusion to ASIC’s investigation, and
- the cost of proceedings (civil, criminal or administrative) brought by ASIC where the withheld information will have to be disclosed in responding to the claims in those proceedings. Delay in disclosing the withheld information to ASIC may also result in ASIC seeking its costs in civil proceedings even if you successfully defend the proceedings by reliance on the withheld information.
Companies in external administration
In the case of an external administration of a company in which both a receiver and a liquidator or administrator have been concurrently appointed, it is ASIC’s position that, subject to the terms of the receiver’s deed of appointment, the receiver has the right to assert or waive any privilege (to the exclusion of the liquidator or administrator) in respect of any communications concerning an asset forming part of the secured property.
Claims by lawyers
If you are a lawyer and make an LPP claim to ASIC as the privilege holder, you should follow the procedure set out in Section 3 to make a claim. In these circumstances, ASIC will not accept an attempt by you to rely on section 69 of the ASIC Act or section 296 of the National Credit Act.